User Tools

Site Tools


fragmentation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
fragmentation [2007/05/21 18:54] – updated to reflect the v0.9 changes darkaudaxfragmentation [2007/05/25 00:00] – add alternate attack methods darkaudax
Line 92: Line 92:
  
   * When to say no to a packet?  You may ask if there are times when you should say "no" to selecting a specific packet.  Yes, if you chose a packet before that didn't work, you can ignore this type of packet the next time.  Examples might be strange multicast mac address, or anything else suspicious.   * When to say no to a packet?  You may ask if there are times when you should say "no" to selecting a specific packet.  Yes, if you chose a packet before that didn't work, you can ignore this type of packet the next time.  Examples might be strange multicast mac address, or anything else suspicious.
 +
  
  
Line 100: Line 101:
   * Make sure you are on the same channel as the AP.   * Make sure you are on the same channel as the AP.
   * Also see the general aireplay-ng troubleshooting ideas: [[aireplay-ng#usage_troubleshooting|aireplay-ng usage troubleshooting]].   * Also see the general aireplay-ng troubleshooting ideas: [[aireplay-ng#usage_troubleshooting|aireplay-ng usage troubleshooting]].
 +
 +Although not a direct troubleshooting tip for the fragmentation attack, if you are unable to get the attack to work, there are some alternate attacks you should consider:
 +
 +  * [[korek_chopchop|Korek chopchop Attack]]: This is an alternate technique to obtain PRGA for building packets for subsequent injection.
 +  * [[interactive_packet_replay#other_examples|-p 0841 method]]: This technique allows you to reinject any data packet received from the access point and generate IVs.
  
  
fragmentation.txt · Last modified: 2009/09/05 23:32 by mister_x