how_to_crack_wep_via_a_wireless_client
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
how_to_crack_wep_via_a_wireless_client [2008/05/19 19:26] – Fyx a mispeelinng. netrolller3d | how_to_crack_wep_via_a_wireless_client [2009/09/11 21:12] – fixed typo darkaudax | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Tutorial: | ====== Tutorial: | ||
- | Version: 1.16 August 25, 2007 \\ | + | Version: 1.17 September 11, 2009 \\ |
By: darkAudax \\ | By: darkAudax \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
- | There has been a lot of discussion over time of how to use a wireless client workstation to generate packets to crack WEP instead of the wireless access point itself. This tutorial describes four approaches with examples of how to do this. The examples provided are from from real working equipment, not theory. | + | There has been a lot of discussion over time of how to use a wireless client workstation to generate packets to crack WEP instead of the wireless access point itself. This tutorial describes four approaches with examples of how to do this. The examples provided are from real working equipment, not theory. |
The basic idea is to have the wireless client workstation generate data packets with IVs which we can use to crack the WEP key. Normally we have the access point itself generate the data packets with IVs. So why would you need to leverage a wireless client workstation instead of the access point? Here are just a few of the reasons: | The basic idea is to have the wireless client workstation generate data packets with IVs which we can use to crack the WEP key. Normally we have the access point itself generate the data packets with IVs. So why would you need to leverage a wireless client workstation instead of the access point? Here are just a few of the reasons: |
how_to_crack_wep_via_a_wireless_client.txt · Last modified: 2018/03/11 20:17 by mister_x